When choosing your board, take the
time and energy to make solid choices.
One of the most common mistakes
by entrepreneurs is to "stack" the board with
members friendly to their cause. While it may
be comforting to know that your position is "secure"
regardless of how well or poorly you are executing
your duties, it deprives you of the opportunity
for an honest, independent performance appraisal.
An independent board is in the best position to
take an unbiased view of the company's and the
CEO's performance.
Sensitive issues arise in any company.
Some of them may be related to the performance
of key executives or the CEO. Others may be directly
related to the future of the company, i.e., succession
issues, financing alternatives or merger/acquisitions.
These issues are best handled when the CEO is
able to speak freely with his board and seek advice
without other members of the management team present.
A board with too many representatives from management,
in our experience, is far less effective and often
results in second-guessing and behind-the-scenes
discussions and maneuvering.
If you raise money from professional
venture capital investors, they will usually request
a board seat to look after their investment. Most
reputable venture capitalists have experience
in serving on multiple boards and can be of substantial
value to your company. However, they are not likely
to be experts in your specific line of business.
Seek to balance the board's composition by adding
someone with experience in your market segment.
In addition, make sure to include one director
with a strong financial background and another
who is the CEO or VP of marketing of a successful
company in a complementary business segment. These
people can provide insight not only on issues
specific to your company, but also provide a broader
perspective on industry trends, etc.
A board will function best when
it is prepared, i.e., the members are up-to-date
on the state of company and have had time to think
through the major issues. One of the worst mistakes
for an entrepreneur is to surface major bad or
unexpected news during a board meeting. This forces
board members into a reactive posture and doesn't
give them adequate time to reflect upon appropriate
alternatives. We always encourage the CEOs of
our portfolio companies to call all directors
beforehand with a brief overview of the major
topics to be covered at the board meeting. If
possible, provide all board members with necessary
materials for review well in advance of the meeting.
Too many companies view their board
as window dressing and board meetings as a nuisance
in which the management gives carefully rehearsed
"dog and pony shows. Qualified board members have
a wealth of contacts that the CEO can and should
tap into, whether potential customers, partners
or additional investors. Outside board members
can be effective in evaluating the company's strategy
and a valuable resource in recruiting other members
to the management team. Don't hesitate to ask
and insist on their involvement in specific issues.
If board members are unable or unwilling to spend
the time necessary to help the company and/or
CEO, they shouldn't be on the board in the first
place.
The board of directors is a legal
structure that provides a fiduciary oversight
of a company on behalf of all shareholders. Most
of the time the board will agree with the strategy
and actions proposed by the management. Sometimes,
however, the board may disagree and even insist
on a course of action that is different from the
one proposed by the CEO and the management team.
Heed the advice of your board members. They are
not after your job, but are merely doing what,
in their judgment, is in the best interest of
the company and its shareholders.
If you treat your board of directors
as an adversary that needs to be overpowered and
controlled, you miss out on the value they can
provide. If you see them as an ally, you'll be
able to tap into a significant resource base with
a tremendous payoff to you and your company.
|